(3rd Part) Analysis & answer of Dr.Zakir Naik's 25 mistake in 5 min



(3rd Part) Analysis & answer of Dr.Zakir Naik's 25 mistake in 5 min

12) Twelfth mistake:   Jakir says, ‘One of the Hominids is ‘Dosnopyticest”.
Ahmed said, “its rather “Australopithecus”.

Analysis: Did you hear it really? Just see again and listen, Zakir just said Australopithecus not Dosnopyticest. Its just a lie . See this part in video ---

Decision: Nothing but a vague and fake complain against Zakir.

13) Thirteenth mistake:  Jakir said, “Australopithecus died about 3.5 million years ago, which was an ICE AGE “.
The objector said, “There were no ice age 3.5 million years ago, rather ice age was about 1.6 million to 10,000 years ago”.

Analysis:  There were at least five major ice ages in earth till now.  Australopithecus Africanas existed between 3 – 2 million years ago, then died. Last major ice age started about 2.58 million years ago which is the time when Australopithecus Africanas died.  So it’s absurd to say that 3.5 million years ago is wrong and 3 million years is correct. Taking just that .5 million in consideration.  See the proof here --- 


Decision:  It’s not wrong; rather Jakir was more correct than Ahmed, because ice age didn’t start at 1.6 million years ago.

14) Fourteenth  mistake:  Jakir said, “Homo sapiens died about 500000 years ago.
Ahmed said, “Homo sapiens means human beings. Jakir is also a human but says that human died 500000 years ago”. 
Analysis:  One thing is true that by the word homo sapiens, actually we mean human. But remember, homo sapiens is of four types --

·       Homo sapiens idaltu a proposed subspecies (extinct) related to the modern human subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens
·       Homo sapiens neanderthalensis an alternative to Homo neanderthalsis that implies Neanderthal man
·       Homo sapiens rhodesiensis  an alternative nomenclature for Homo rhodesiensis
·       Homo sapiens sapiens  subspecies that precisely represents modern humans

Proof:

So, the word, “Homo sapiens died” doesn’t mean that human beings died. The objector was a bit rude against zakir here.  But Zakir should have said, actually which subspecies he meant among these four homo sapiens.

Decision:  Zakir Naik provided incomplete information.

15) Fifteenth mistake:   Jakir said, Neanderthal man died about 100 thousand to 40 thousand years ago”.
Objector Ahmed said, “ No, they died 30 thousand years ago and also Neanderthals are not in the line of modern man”.

Analysis:  Neanderthals are of course in the line of modern man. Ahmed gave us false information.  See proof here  ---


But Neanderthals lived about 600 thousand to 30 thousand years ago. So Jakir said 40 thousand years. Do you wanna think it to be a mistake ( speaking 40 thousand instead of 30 thousand ) ? Even recently about another Neanderthal man’s fossil was discovered which is about 24 thousand years old.

Decision:  Neanderthals are under modern man’s line, its true statement of Zakir but The year should not be 100 to 40 thousand , rather 30 thousand. 
16) Sixteenth mistake:  Jakir said, Then came the 4th stage, the cro- magnon”.    
Objector said, “ Cro- magnon is nothing but homo sapiens”.

Analysis:  So what’s the difference? Instead of homo sapiens, jakir used cro magnon , which is same. Where is the mistake ?

Decision:  Jakir was correct.

17) Seventeenth mistake:  Jakir said, There is no link between the stages”.
Ahmed said, “No, There are links”. 

Analysis:   Actually there is a lot of debate about these links. Changing from just a little amoeba to human being needs billions of links which are really time consuming to find. Also there are many links but not enough to prove the whole change. May be scientists will need some hundreds to thousands years to get the links and then sort it. May be not. But arguing about this issue is worthless.
Decision:  Both are correct.

18) Eighteenth mistake:  Jakir said,  “Albert Georgie invented vitamin C”.  
Objector Ahmed said, “ Georgie didn’t invent it, rather discovered it”.

Analysis: How dishonest and mean is Mr. so called Ahmed to argue about invent and discover. If you say “ I ate a bread and a glass of juice”. Ahmed will say, you did wrong because you rather drank the juice not eat . Amazing.  

Decision:  Its not a mistake rather just slip of tongue, which we generally do in our day today life.

19) Nineteenth mistake: Jakir said, “Georgie wrote a book named Crazy ape n man”.
Ahmed said, “ No, It was Crazy ape”.

Analysis:  Difference between Crazy ape n man aand Crazy ape ? What sort of ill mentality to argue with such stupid things.

Decision:  Jakir used incomplete name.

20 Twentieth mistake:   Jakir said, “Scientist Rupert Albert gave a theory against Darwin”.  
Ahmed said, “ There is no man named Rupert Albert”.
 
Analysis:  Here also Jakir misspelled. There are a lot of scientists who spoke against Darwin. He might have used the wrong name here. He could use the following names instead who wrote against Darwin




 
Another theory against Darwin’s theory , although nothing special

 
Decision: Jakir misspelled.

21) Twenty first mistake:  Jakir said, Scientist Frank Salisbury said, ‘its absurd to believe Darwin’s theory”.  
Ahmed said, “There is no scientist named Salisbury”.  

Analysis:  Frank B. Salisbury was a botanist, who really spoke against Darwin theory.  See his name at 183 serial of 480 intellectuals, who spoke against Darwin.


Have a look at Salisbury’s profile here in wiki


The name of his book was Doubts About the Modern Synthetic Theory of Evolution

Decision:  Jakir was correct. 

PART 4 

No comments:

Post a Comment