(4TH Part) Analysis & answer of
Dr.Zakir Naik's 25 mistake in 5 min
22)
Twenty second mistake: Jakir
said, “Another
person, named Sir Whitemit wrote a book against Darwin”.
Ahmed said, “ There is no scientist names Sir Whitemith”.
Analysis: Yeah no scientist was found
named Sir Whitesmith but possibly he again misspelled. Two very close sciensts
are found.
105th person named A.J.
Monty White -- May be instead of White
Monty he used White mit.
408th person, named, Mark G. White । May be instead of White Mark he used White mit.
But Its sure that
both these intellectuals spoke against Darwin theory.
Decision:
Jakir misspelled again.
23)
Twenty third mistake: Jakir said, “Amoeba may change into
paramecia”.
Ahmed said, “There is no such thing as paramecia, its
paramecium”.
Decision:
No
mistake at all. Paramecia is the singular form of paramecium. The objector got
crazy I see.
24)
Twenty fourth mistake: Jakir said, “Hansis
Craig spoke against Darwin”.
Ahmed said, “There is no such
scientist named Hansis Craig.
Analysis:
Yeah no scientist was
found named Hansis Craig. But 3 scientista were found named Fransis , all of
whom spoke against Darwin.
They are the 4th , 162th and 249th person of
the list.
4. Francis
Hitching
162. Francis
J. Beckwith
249. Joseph
W. Francis
Decision:
Jakir misspelled again.
25)
Twenty fifth mistake: Jakir said, “In
1861, Darwin wrote a letter to his friend that he also do not believe in
Natural Selection and that he also did not get proof”.
Objector said, “ Darwin wrote the book 2 years before the
letter was written and Darwin of course believed in his theory”.
Analysis:
Is there any reason why a
man can’t believe his theory two years after he publishes it ? Is it a logic at
all? Moreover as Darwin didn’t get 100% proof of his theories, how can he
believe his theory 100% ? A lot of evidences are now being found.
Decision:
Unnecessary argument of
the objector. Jakir wasn’t wrong. But its better to know the source of that
letter from Jakir.
26)
Twenty sixth mistake: Jakir
said, “
Most scientists supported Darwin because it was against Church and they
disliked church”.
Objector said, “ Most of the scientists were religious and they
didn’t hate church”.
Analysis: The church was so powerful
that time that, if anyone invented something and unintentionally it went
against any law of bible, church punished them brutally , even it caused them
death.
Lets have some proof here
Copernicus, Galileo and a lot of other scientists had to suffer much
torture a lot for invention . Actually
Ahmed was trying to save a community blindly.
Decision:
It’s not a mistake.
27)
Twenty seventh mistake: Jakir
said, “P.P. Grace said that It is absurd. We cannot know who were our ancestors based on
fossils.”
Objector said, “It is dishonest of Naik to use such old quotes when he knows
that more recent quotes from the same scientist would contradict him”.
Analysis: Point to be noticed that
the objector didn’t refuse that P.P. Grasse didn’t tell this. It means that
Jakir was right that P.P. Grasse said this.
If P.P. Grasse said something opposite later on, just give us the
link. We will know. But it’s rather dishonest to call someone dishonest for
speaking the truth.
Decision:
Jakir wasn’t wrong.
28)
Twenty eighth mistake: Jakir
said, “Sir Fred Hoyle worked against Darwin theory”.
The objector said, “Sir Fred Hoyle was an astronomer, not a
botanist. So he can’t work against Darwin theory”.
Analysis: Sir Fred Hoyle really was
an astronomer. But he of course worked against Darwin’s theory and he also gave
his own theory against Darwin theory.
Have a look at the proof ---
The objector just spoke lies here against Dr. Zakir.
Decision: Jakir was right.
29)
Twenty ninth mistake: Jakir
said, “It’s
unthinkable. You cannot think that we are created from the apes”.
Objector said, “Biologically, we are apes still. The idea is that we
share a common ancestor with the living apes”.
Analysis: Look, you may have the
same body structure as ape; you and ape may have the same grandfather, no
problem. But of course I am not gonna call ape as my uncle until it starts
gossiping with me and cooks me a cup of tea.
Decision: Until and unless a monkey
or chimpanzee or an ape is completely converted to human, none can prove that
someday these monkeys transformed into human and later on they started hating
human so much that they promised not to transform into human again.
Analysis
of the 29 mistakes Zakir was claimed to have made:
·
Mistakes-------------------------------------------- 02
·
Incomplete
information--------------------------- 03
·
Misspelled------------------------------------------- 04
· Fake complain
against Zakir Naik------------ 20
Thanks. Very helpful.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the analysis.People can make mistakes but instead of answering to his arguments they resort to being rude and making false claims against the person and that shows the mentality of the person and his followers.
ReplyDeleteamazing. especially the links attached
ReplyDelete